Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Traxo
on 31/05/2020, 07:14:32 UTC
New post Armstrong tries to make it look like he was right about the virus 

"Thailand has 56 deaths out of 69 million people. Japan has announced no lockdown as there were only 850 deaths 126.5 million."

Cherry picking counties he fails to mention that over 100k have died in the US and almost 600k world wide this is the deadliest virus since the Spanish Flu.

On January 28th he wrote
" I have pretty good sources and they do not expect this to cause a lot of deaths. "

The "sources" he talks about are probably just the usual people that anybody can follow, I pointed out one of them might be David Icke

David Icke made a decent summary of events and information in the interview with London Real: 
https://www.bitchute.com/video/H4W7FwBy0Ukh/ 

He cited experts in relevant fields. Many people are coming out already exposing the "coronahoax". 
Icke used Andrew Kaufman as main source of information, but of course he's not the only one coming out, probably just the most popular today when it comes to certain perspective - which is that "viruses" are not contagious at all. There is just a new test, which doesn't even test for the virus. 

For example, here is 1993 material on the germ theory: 

[Germ Theory Deception series] 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BN8iKDjUoA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9WBaIu5URo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWCTqFAOGas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxewDaUsDT8

Nobel Prize Winner Kary Mullis Challenges The Myths About AIDS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPYFjDSG0JU
> 17:32 Mullis says: "The way to get rid of AIDS is to stop funding it"

(Kary Mullis invented the PCR technique in the first place, and died of pneumonia few months before coronahoax)

Over the past 30 years, journalist Jon Rappoport has been investigating so called "epidemics" - his conclusion is that all were hoaxes. All documented.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/   
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/sars/ 


Even if you believe that the "virus" is real (i.e. different perspective on the matter), you can also look at the data and see for yourself that the "virus" is not deadly as depicted at all: 

I do not even know how the media plans to respond to the CDC itself publishing their own estimation that “coronavirus” is literally just the flu – except to ignore it, which is what they are doing so far.

In their seven-page document “Coronavirus Pandemic Planning Scenarios,” uploaded a few days ago, they estimate an overall symptomatic case fatality ratio of 0.004.

More than 99% of coronavirus patients who died in Italy suffered from other, pre-existing health issues, according to a study by the country’s health officials. [...]
The average age of the victims was 79.5.

Specially when patients are labeled as died OF the "coronavirus" whenever they tested positive (and sometimes even without a test, if they showed some of the symptoms). 
Similar information regarding "covid-19" is getting harder to find due to extremely high censorship (as Marty also pointed out in the linked blog). 


I'll stop here, but my point is that I don't think Marty was wrong to downplay the virus. 
It is not as deadly as we are lead to believe by the MSM and the officials. Do we need Marty to tell us that? No, of course not, but he did say it.