I will gladly resign from responding to your ad hominems, when you and all the other "Affirmative Action" candidates will stop milking the hapless organization Chipmixer like a cow.
I don't think you know what an ad hominem argument is--or at least the quotes you posted don't demonstrate anything of the sort.
Affirmative action? May I ask exactly what you mean by that when referring to Chipmixer? I don't see how anyone got into the Chipmixer campaign because they were an under-represented minority. That campaign is the closest thing to a meritocracy as I've seen on the ol' intertubes, and thankfully it only accepts the cream of the crop.
I write fearlessly, how beautiful it is if it bothers someone. Be open to different thoughts.
That's fine and all, but the question is about how you'd be handing out merits if you were made a merit source. If you merited mostly Turkish members, I wouldn't have a problem with that in the least, as I support merit sources in local boards....but much of what you express is agenda-driven, emotional, and not altogether rational. That should be taken into account when considering giving someone the power (admittedly, it isn't much) to distribute merits above and beyond what that person has earned himself. I don't trust that you wouldn't misuse that power, but that's just my opinion--Theymos is the one calling the shots here as far as all of this is concerned.