The autopsy report attributes his death to “being restrained, his underlying health conditions, and any potential intoxicants in his system”
It is an autopsy report. It is supposed to be based exclusively on medical science.
You cannot attribute as a cause of death something for which there is no evidence. “Any potential intoxicants” is something for which there is no evidence. Therefore it cannot be a cause of death.
The autopsy report is fundamentally flawed and part of an attempted cover up.
An autopsy report talks about "potential intoxicants"?
I thought autopsies included blood tests, including intoxicants.
Sounds like a cover-up to me too.
Whether or not the coroner was a willing participant is the question. Coroners can be scared shitless of law enforcement brutality too.
It's a preliminary report only, the final report is yet to come, presumably with a toxic report.