Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SCAM ALERT
by
wixiplay
on 01/06/2020, 10:27:34 UTC
the odds are very close to 1 in 100 million.. very close.. i had similiar odds occur to me 10 times in a row when i tried to win the wagering contest betting 1.01 to win.. i was losing atleast 6 out of 100.. every time!



VERIFIED SCAM



WixiPlay Casino is blacklisted by Wizard of Odds for cheating and not paying withdrawals to players since February.

https://wizardofodds.com/online-gambling/wixiplay-io/
How Wixiplay Casino Cheats -- Part 1
How Wixiplay Casino Cheats -- Part 2


WixiPlay: Provably Unfair Gambling Practices at Anonymous Online Casino

Wixiplay.io is rigged | one in ten million session | fake PF


I tested it out today again and on my very first roll the server seed didn't match the server seed hash.

I did a 2x coin flip for my entire 1mbtc deposit.  Before the round it said serverseed_hash = e09d311bd7d007bce4141ea30b7ea726cad88b592af8993d3c45b4a6d15e2138

After the round, it said serverseed = 5f14e5353a6b5d4ab3039a232cf9f72924d77cbbac1cb750ff7f1b5ea0c85809TeUBURTRQY, which doesn't hash to what they said it would hash to.

This is the smoking gun of cheating.  They are changing the server seed to alter the outcome of the game.




Basically the simple-version is:

* wixiplay uses a unique server-seed per bet (and thus unique server-seed-hash per bet)

* To verify a bet, you need to record the sever-seed-hash *BEFORE* you bet (that way you know they didn't change the server seed in response to your bet)

* To get the the server-seed hash you have to go out of your way and specifically request it, for that bet

---

So what this means, is wixiplay knows if you're able to verify the bet or not. If you're not able to verify the bet, it has free-reign to undetectably cheat!


--

If BitwiseOperator played 523 coin-flips and only won 199, his maths is probably correct (I don't actually know off-hand to do that calculation, so I tried to simulate it. After 200 million simulations, it appears to only happen every 1 in ~5 million times, so it's definitely an (expected) real freak occurrence. )

Combined with the fact they're using a *totally pointless* nonce , makes me feel like they're trying to (maliciously?!) pass their system off their system as a traditional provably fair (which it's definitely not).

The PF system is working 100%
I'm getting bored replying to your false accusations, you don't get bored of trashtalk.