So the reason why the GPUs find solution faster, is by the sheer number of Kangaroos they bring to the hunt? Example, I can find solution 50 times faster with GPU versus CPU, but GPU has more than 50 times the amount of Kangaroos. Something like that?
Exactly.
For example look at the number of the kangaroos and at the speed for my cpu:
.\Kangaroo -t 4 .\in.txt
Start:49DCCFD96DC5DF56487436F5A1B18C4F5D34F65DDB48CB5E0000000000000000
Stop :49DCCFD96DC5DF56487436F5A1B18C4F5D34F65DDB48CB5EFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Keys :2
Number of CPU thread: 4
Range width: 2^64
Number of random walk: 2^12.00 (Max DP=18)
DP size: 18 [0xFFFFC00000000000]
SolveKeyCPU Thread 0: 1024 kangaroos
SolveKeyCPU Thread 2: 1024 kangaroos
SolveKeyCPU Thread 1: 1024 kangaroos
SolveKeyCPU Thread 3: 1024 kangaroos[17.67 MKey/s][GPU 0.00 MKey/s][Count 2^26.19][Dead 0][06s][1.1MB]
and for my gpu:
.\Kangaroo -gpu -t 4 .\in.txt
Kangaroo v1.3
Start:49DCCFD96DC5DF56487436F5A1B18C4F5D34F65DDB48CB5E0000000000000000
Stop :49DCCFD96DC5DF56487436F5A1B18C4F5D34F65DDB48CB5EFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Keys :2
Number of CPU thread: 4
Range width: 2^64
Number of random walk: 2^19.01 (Max DP=10)
DP size: 10 [0xFFC0000000000000]
SolveKeyCPU Thread 1: 1024 kangaroos
SolveKeyCPU Thread 3: 1024 kangaroos
SolveKeyCPU Thread 2: 1024 kangaroos
SolveKeyCPU Thread 0: 1024 kangaroos
GPU: GPU #0 Quadro M2200 (8x128 cores) Grid(16x256) (57.0 MB used)
SolveKeyGPU Thread GPU#0: creating kangaroos...
SolveKeyGPU Thread GPU#0: 2^19.00 kangaroos in 3848.2ms
[68.93 MKey/s][GPU 37.47 MKey/s][Count 2^29.12][Dead 0][14s][48.3MB]CPU: 1024 kangaroo times 4, speed: 17.67 MKey/s
GPU: 2^19.00 kangaroos, speed: 69 MKey/s
kangaroo speed on cpu: 17.67 MKey/s / 4096 =
4314 key/skangaroo speed on gpu: 68.93 MKey/s / 2^19 =
131 key/s