Option B won cause people (you included) are greedy. Simple as that.
But it's easier to say devs are greedy.
Here it doesn't matter who is greedy or not.
If a situation/proposition was the subject of a vote, and one side won, the devs/team/system should implement the decision, no matter if you/they/anyone like it or not. I don't know the story but if what LaaMos Seeth said is true, that the winning side proposition wasn't implemented, then why they started a vote session in the first place?
Not talking about governance power and stuff. Simply don't do it, because if you do this, is like you said: "Let's vote! But if you win you'll loose anyway" - in other words - let's vote if you wish, as we will piss on the result anyway, because we can.
I guess it was put to vote by admins in TG cause you were annoying about it so they went with it.
As for results, you cannot expect something to be implemented when only a fraction of total identities voted.
So winning option got minimal % of total votes. Not representative at all. If it was 54% of all identities, then devs would possibly need to consider it.