Desktop keeps attacking me like I am the reason that this coin is worth less than 3 satoshi. That's the problem with those people. They always come up with new excuses, blaming everyone but themselves. It's bots keeping the price down, someone put a sell wall, bad economy, covid, it's monday, it's sunday and they don't work etc. If Shannon has any decency he should join the discussion. He won't because he knows that I'm telling the truth. The argument that I turned off some kind of a deal to swap for (at that time) completely unknown token is completely irrelevant because 99,9% of coval holders didn't get this chance. It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. The tokenomics article explains everything and it's everyone's own choice to keep dreaming or accept the reality.
From my own point of view, while I feel myself somewhat fooled, I could understand I am not an asset to this project, so it might be unfair for me demand whole benefits from developers' work just because I am stubborn (or lazy, or greedy) enough to still hold some Coval... I just hope devs will consider possible implications, and will give some value to Coval too, even if MBTS will become the main store of this project's value. That could be a reasonable consensus for Coval holders who missed on the opportunity offered to insiders and active community.
If they didn't want to share the benefits they shouldn't advertise coval as a main token for emblem. They wouldn't get the benefit of dumping coval on community members and getting development money. That's my point. Shannon can say whatever he wants (that coval will always be the most important etc.) but just by creating this new token potential gains for coval holders have been cut off massively. His words and his actions are totally different.