My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it. He asked in a courteous way if I would remove the negative trust I left on his account (albeit in the wrong section of the forum), which was a big step up from his previous behavior, so I did. As a result, the situation has been de-escalated.
Q: But what about him promising to remove his negative trust on you? Doesn't that count toward some kind of extortion attempt, to which you willingly conceded?
A: We all know his feedback does not show up as default. If I cared so much about about it, I would have been bothered about it in April.
I see, so your defense is your rating was invalid to begin with.
Conceded? What did I concede exactly? StonerStanely is a manipulative cunt just like you are, and he played you like a fiddle jumping in while you were all riled up and got you to wipe his rating clean because you were so pissed off at me. This is funny because he is also pretty retarded, but he managed to manipulate you anyway. Lets break this down...
-You left a rating you say was invalid to begin with
-This sock puppeting extortionist trust abuser manipulated you into removing it because you were so emotional and thought it was a way to "get" me because you know he, much like you has an obsession with me
-Here you are once again trying to make this into some kind of crime I perpetrated to distract from your own irrational and emotion based actions
In summary, you are ok with a person who is a known
sockpuppeting,
extortionist,
trust system abuser as long as it serves your personal vendettas. Is that about right?