I can show you where the animosity is - it is right here in the very next post:
Let me point you to a message signed yesterday from an address that was posted (in 2015) AKA 2 years before the hack (hack= sometimes in 2017).
[u rl= suspicious link removed ]CLICK HERE[/url]
[u rl= suspicious link removed ]AND THEN CLICK HERE[/url]
[u rl= suspicious link removed ]CLICK HERE[/url]
[u rl= suspicious link removed ]AND THEN CLICK HERE[/url]
No animosity on my side, I just don't understand why you insist he signs a message from a wallet he doesn't have access to.
He has signed a message from an address posted in april 2015 in an unedited message (from april 2015) (he has done it 3 times)
If the administrators and the recovery team were happy with him using, why are you making it hard ?
Here's a new one:
"I Razick am the sole owner of the address 1vayZZw4U1pKQic2FjZ7aYg8e1qDSNxCC. Today's date is 6/9/2020."
Signature: HEstMca7FsXTTzIj8xgQmKA2dW4gtMGXb9+6iAizcDRwk8ytf+DCZUXWjdHIR1WNl5CIOFRwzaTDvpWJ2x/Doz4=
Exclude quotes to verify message. Bare Signature (QT Compatible).
Signature verified using Electrum"I Razick am the sole owner of the address 1vayZZw4U1pKQic2FjZ7aYg8e1qDSNxCC. Today's date is 6/9/2020."
Signature: HEstMca7FsXTTzIj8xgQmKA2dW4gtMGXb9+6iAizcDRwk8ytf+DCZUXWjdHIR1WNl5CIOFRwzaTDvpWJ2x/Doz4=
Exclude quotes to verify message. Bare Signature (QT Compatible).
I also managed to verify it using Brainwallet: Verified.
So this should be good for a start.
message from 2015 (unedited) : Proof of Address Ownership, Razick, 1vayZZw4U1pKQic2FjZ7aYg8e1qDSNxCC = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1028029.0
it can't be quoted as "archived" and locked by OP.
Unedited message from April 2015
His message and signature have been verified by at least 3 persons (two members here with screenshots and the recovery team).
He has said at least twice that he doesn't have access to those random btc addresses from 2014.
Why the extra drama ?