No one placed a red trust rating for him?
LOL
Nice sweet cherries you picked there. Here is what I said:
no one has posted a red trust rating (or any kind of rating) for StonerStanley about him being a "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser", including yourself.
The highlighted part is what nutildah is allegedly "excusing". So why would you cut out only part of that sentence... rhetorical question. Please carry on making up bullshit accusations out of thin air.
I see! It has to be ALL THREE otherwise it doesn't count! Careful you don't sprain your ankle doing all those backflips.
I am not trying to do anything but hold you accountable for your actions.
Okay, have fun.
So this isn't what you were saying here?
My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it...
flimsy ≠ frivolous
"Flimsy" means something that is a tag-able offense but easily forgivable. Stanley didn't scam anyone so the danger presented by removing my red trust on him is low to non-existent. "Frivolous" would mean leaving a red trust for somebody because they called you an incel.
I don't need to red tag you or Stoner for it, because unlike you I don't abuse red trust ratings. This does effect me, trust system abuse effects everyone.
1. That's your opinion. I would say the red trust you left on Vod is abuse.
2. Explain how it affects you. Or don't. I don't actually care.
Ah, yes, it is all very technical and nuanced. So nuanced it can mean opposing ideas at the same time. I already explained how it effects me. Weird that you have given negative ratings simply for having alt accounts in the past, but those were people who disagreed with you, so that was ok. This person disagrees with me, so best to overlook it since it serves your personal goals and soothes your emotional voids at the expense of the trust system and overall community.