He call the Low on March 23 and then he expect a bounce for 2 weeks . Good call .
But he did not expect the bounce to turn into a LEAP. The stock market bounce
and leap like a frog after a vicious drop generating a slingshot move and the move
was fuel by the FED QE infinity money printing which provide ammo for small time traders in US
to fuel the market even more . he did not expect that .
Armstrong didn't call the low he said a possible temporary low then following has called for a retest of the of low for the past 40% drop
Indeed, if he correctly called the low why is it that no Armstrong-subscriber made any money from the most vicious rally ever?
But he did not expect the bounce to turn into a LEAP. The stock market bounce
and leap like a frog after a vicious drop generating a slingshot move and the move
was fuel by the FED QE infinity money printing which provide ammo for small time traders in US
to fuel the market even more . he did not expect that .
He is useless but correctly called the low?
Armstrong didn't call the low he said a possible temporary low then following has called for a retest of the of low for the past 40% drop
Indeed, if he correctly called the low why is it that no Armstrong-subscriber made any money from the most vicious rally ever?
Armstrong said a "potential temporary low" on the 23rd March. He did not say it was the LOW. The same way he has been calling a "potential high" every week since the start of April.
If he writes "we might see a potential high/low" it is vague enough if hes wrong it doesn't matter because he said "potentially" but if he is correct he can claim he was right