I don't believe that being false makes red trust "better".
It wasn't false. I was accurate and left a reference with a more detailed explanation, although many of the atrocities were left out because they were so vulgar I didn't feel the need to publicly state them.
Still a shitty excuse to use red trust to adjudicate your personal squabbles, particularly considering that you have a history of lying about such things.
When I'm attacked repeatedly by someone who threatens me personally with physical violence and lies about it on the forum even after I've blocked them, it is most definitely reason for me to not trust someone. That user was clearly seeing how far he could push me before I acted, and I gave him what he wanted. I also don't have a history of lying at all. Actually quite the opposite as I have currently the second highest trust rating here. I would say you have a history of befriending and defending trolls, which has made you susceptible to believing their lies, and your ignorance towards my actions coupled with your easily manipulated mind has placed you in a position where you will believe anything negative that is said about me and repeat it ad nauseam regardless of it being based on any actual truth.
Except theymos didn't put me into any trust networks. Perhaps you should learn how the trust system works if you want to pursue that angle of attack on me.
Trust networks are influenced by merit, and theymos made you a merit source which is the judgement I'm questioning. Maybe you should learn how the trust system works since theymos has made you the single most influential personal in crafting it's future. Biggest travesty on bitcointalk in my opinion, as your judgement has been total shit from when you started here.