Re: Craig Steven Wright is a liar and a fraud - Tulip Trust addresses signed message
Not that it's getting too boring.. 4D chess again
Does playing 4D chess require lying, defrauding, swindling, doctoring documents, and impostoring? Because he's losing, and no one is playing his game. obviously he is playing against himself. thats why he thinks he can win. as he is a half wit, one half will win.. right?
4D chess FTW
Technically speaking, all games of chess are 4D chess. The chessboard and its pieces are 3D.
see? thats why i could never rise to the csw levels of.. whatever it is. i miss such obvious things.
*sigh*
Technically speaking, he’s playing poker with everyone. He actually tweeted a steganographic message about it ~3 years ago. Anybody know what cards he’s holding or is this the amateur table?
Most of us don't play with known frauds/scammers, and it took about 5 minutes (or maybe less) for many of us to hear him first speak to realize that he was a fraud/scammer/narcisist.
His subsequent actions have largely just confirmed the initial impressions, so probably anyone at the table would merely be bag holders of one sort or another filled with hopium and believing in matters that are contrary to the facts.
So you’re telling me the groupthinkers outdid the real thinkers? Would be the first time in history. Hey, don’t forget to wear your mask in dead heat of summer. The TV says there’s a pandemic.
I am not saying that because if you want to show that there are some folks here in the forum engaging in group think because they tend to be skeptical of shitcoins or various attacks on bitcon such as bcash forks, then you have the burden to show such proof of group think... sure go ahead with your proof.. it is likely to come off as a bunch of gibberish, but I am not going to accept your nonsensical conclusory assertion that there is group think going on without some kind of meaningful evidence (which would be a need for both facts and logic... good luck with that).
The face mask situation and various precautions against a virus remains a bit more of a complicated question, and seems to be a far from adequate attempt at an analogical way of arguing your nonsensical points to the extent that you have any points. Is that what you were trying to do, an analogical argument? lame at best, right?
Hard to explain, especially with NDAs, but basically I’m saying I’m high caliber.