Unfortunately, no advantage of this was taken.
Because our dev couldn't bear with the criticism they had from the community. Despite they had ban a lot of users for small issues which shut all the mouths. We could have done a lot of steps at that time.
Yes, first half of 2018 was the key period for investments as DeepOnion had huge funds. Now, it will be much more difficult. Also at that time, the community was so passionate and motivated, most of them criticised just because they cared and wanted the project to become better and not to harm it. And of course, many of them saw the obvious mistakes.
But I don't want to discuss the past so much, we should rather look to the future. I'm just reminding all these things, because I'm not convinced that the Team learnt any lesson from this. If not, DeepOnion will continue to go to DeepSh*t.
BTW, I found another competitor of DeepVault, it's called Silent Notary. Seems that the competition in blockchain notarization will be strong in the future. DeepOnion should find some marketing guru soon, before it's too late and the market is split among other projects.
They are listed on Kucoin and Hotbit, seems far better than our listed exchanges. I don't know how much real life usages they have. Since they are dedicated project to notary system, I think ONION will have so hard times soon to compete on the market.
Even though Silent Notary is smaller project in terms of market cap, they are listed on better exchanges as DeepOnion. So it's difficult to understand, why DeepOnion can't have better exchanges as well.
And regarding blockchain notary competition, Silent Notary claim to be able to do notarization of phone calls, videos, whole websites, almost everything. If this is true, who would want to use DeepVault then?
Soon it's going to be time for airdrop 2.0 .... The second harvest is coming. The world wants it
Would that be good? It will create short term hype which I think will not bring any potential investors. Would be better if team works with targeting a goal. There are a lot of things have been suggested by the community. I think dev should work accordingly.
I would keep potential airdrop 2.0 as the last chance for recovery if everything fails, together with the recently discussed rebranding. Currently, there are many other things to do.