being put forward by disgruntled and disillusioned members along with the general motives behind those instigating any so-called campaign for change.
I think as was pointed out by a respectful member in another thread some time ago, TECSHARE seems to be adding and removing users on a reciprocal basis for ulterior motives probably based around trying to create a gang-within-a-gang to cause disunity here but having said maybe I should unIGNORE him and try to engage with him on some level such as the manner in which LoyceV is trying.
I want there to be consistent, objective, and equitable rules, not purely a popularity contest which currently determines the current trust system.
"Equitable trust" sounds like some sort of financial group. Trust isn't
meant to be equitable. Trust is
earned. You aren't just entitled to it because you think you deserve it.
What you
want doesn't come into it. The only thing that matters is who people trust and who people don't trust. If people don't trust you, there is no rule that can change that. So if you want something to change, maybe consider starting with your conduct.
Whether you choose to take this as a general observation or a personal attack is up to you, but I find the more people bitch about the trust system, the more suspiciously I view them. Maybe take a break from this little campaign of yours and stop trying so damn hard. You probably aren't doing your cause any favours in the eyes of others.