Are these articles coming off as desperate or what?
I've already commented on that
here, and I think we can explain statements like this by something we can call the
"Lee effect". It seems that little Michael Lee who worked on this discovery, may be a relative of the
famous Tom Lee (Fundstrat).

Your attempt to lump bobby lee and tom lee with michael lee seems misplaced as fuck in order to attempt to name something in an innovative way, but I do not get the connection because bobby lee and tom lee seem to understand bitcoin fundamentals and frequently present bitcoin fundamentals in ways that are in touch with reality... If you can point out your elaboration or some evidence that supports such a connection, then I will be more than willing to explore this purported "lee connection" a bit more... because I sure do like some innovative ways of presenting matters as long as they are based on reality rather than misleading...
I wonder if Torque has seen this one yet?

I am suspecting that even Torque would not be willing to go down this supposedly fun path.
