Mass Surveillance and Crime
Government's propaganda states that mass surveillance can help decrease crime rates.
On the contrary, many "soldiers of privacy" all over the world argue that mass surveillance not only acts as a serious threat to human freedom, but it's also quite ineffective about preventing and fighting criminality.
Are there actual data that support the latter or the former opinion? Otherwise, without proper data, they are just opinions and ideology.
What about the people propaganda, middle class propagande against the rich, ect, ect ?
If it's not effective it's because there is not enough massive surveillance and because some criminals are protecting themselves, not because the surveillance itself is ineffective. It's because of Tor and VPN, Hotspot, ect that massive surveillance is not enough effective AT THE MOMENT.
Your soldiers of privacy should talk to a mother who have a children kidnapped by pedophiles whose are the same pedophiles who are making videos over Tor network, and explain her why this mass surveillance is shit.... maybe you are pedophile then ? it's questionnable... why do you want to hide yourself like that ?
The world must be improve, a lot of things must be improved and encadred but not dismantled.
So according to some people we should let the Iran killing homosexual and the children being kidnapped by pedophiles then say "fuck the massive surveillance" .... what a load of BS.
Some people think that the Rockfeller familly are criminals becauce they are rich, but they thinkg Escobar was a hero because he was killing tons of people.... what are wrong with you guys ?
There are many people who work or worked at the governement, many presidents, every body has it's own opinion.
The massive surveillance is needed because there are too many criminals, and don't talk to me about your governement nbecause there is not a single proof that there is a bunch of people
who are trying to controling the entire world for doing something wrong, but there a proof that a lot of criminals are working for there own interest and they are not in the governement.
The reason why most people are treatening there governement of criminals is just a question of money, the rest they don't know anything because it's politic so it's full of lies and truth but only people concerned
know the truth. You know that they are many criminels in the cities but you aren't sure of who are the criminals in your governements, so don't say shit.
The mass surveillance is necessary because there are too many criminals and liar, stealer, scammer, ect, ect.
I don't see why the massive surveillance could be bad in a world where the people are using it's brain instead of watching TV and shit on facebook. If people start to learn sciences then they will become smarter
and less vulnerable to the massive surveillance.