In other words, if the authorities ask for something, it is very likely that they will get it. It is not at all clear to me why someone still believes that companies like this can do business without cooperating with the authorities?
It's one thing to provide information someone already possesses (e.g. server logs which could be semi-frequently purged), and it's another to be coerced to introduce changes to a service that could deanonymize its users, such as as trying to link Bitcoin addresses with IP addresses, and at company's expense at that.