hacker1001101001 suggested in so many places that he learned his lesson after being exposed as receiving payment for bumping ICO threads to generate fake buzz.
He claimed he had nothing else to hide yet thanks to marlboroza digging deeper it became apparent he had multi-accounts and was part of a group of thread bumpers but declined to name names.
I think Lauda deserves a lot of credit too for keeping sustained pressure on him which helped.
I understand why many trolls do not face a permanent bad (as general rule within the forum) but when they have been exposed in a manner that is extremely detrimental such as the way hacker1001101001 was, it would be expected that he would be reprimanded in some way other than having a signature ban.
I didn't know about this, do you have a link for the reason of his signature ban?