Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: (Non-canonical DER signature)
by
nc50lc
on 26/06/2020, 04:52:10 UTC
⭐ Merited by ETFbitcoin (1)
No, I didn't buy a wallet.dat, I am doing some tries with dormant addresses using the SIGHASH_SINGLE vulnerability for P2PKH addresses.
Is it based from this or something similar: http://joncave.co.uk/2014/08/bitcoin-sighash-single/?
Because if you did, you totally misunderstood the article (read the first paragraph carefully); you're trying to spend a P2PK output and P2PKH outputs that you don't have the control over.

The signatures from your transaction suggest that you're following that exact article.
The redeem script that you've used is even the same as the sample transaction's (Go to "Stealing coins in a new transaction"), it's the same redeem script  Tongue