Cobra is mysterious person and I don't have big trust in him. Especially after these tweets mentioned above in past.
just because someone has a different opinion than you, it is not a reason to not-trust them even if that opinion were wrong.
conversely having the same opinion as you doesn't make someone trustworthy (wolf in sheep clothing).
This is why cobra isn't trustable, he fired and "not-trust" someone just because this person had a different opinion on something that isn't relevant.
I would never believe or work with a person like that, he his full of pretention like his words on the Mozilla's intention which aren't even proved. What a dumb... and this little guy is the administrator of Bitcoin.org ?Well, it's just a little guy with a SSH access on a server and a bit of skill in programming
Cobra is litteraly nobody and bring nothing to the community. I will never share a "bitcoin.org" link on my future plateforms. I hate that kind of persons who are abusing their power.
But i'm right with the comment bellow, we don't give a fk about decentralizing Bitcoin.org. That doesn't change the fact that the ownership still untrustable and disgustable.
EDIT: And what about the fact that cobra is using bitcoin.org to ask donations and also that he put a new bitcoin address since June ? this guy look more like a scammer and a very untrustable person according to multiple facts. Bitcoin.org should not be used to ask donations.
no, he fired him because he was overstepping his position to the point that it was turning into abuse. i don't know why you suddenly came here to bash Cobra so much though. and sure his actions could be considered rash. but what about the actions of the other party?
speaking of donations why in the world was Binns trying to raise funds from centralized companies using bitcoin.org name? bitcoin.org has always been running on donations and the wallet seemed to have $80000 in it already, so what was the need?