I still find it hard to wrap my head over the fact that most economist analyst is aware that continuous printing of money is deterrent to the economy and quality of life in the long-run, but still, the government keeps issuing endless bills. It's not my desire to politicize my views but ideally, economists should run most of the economic policies but it seems the economist is only a remote control tool used by the government to achieve political interest.
It seems the world now runs policies for immediate gains while trashing policies that bring future gains. Maybe I am having a distorted view, but looking at most government policies around the world, even a non-economist can tell that this will be disastrous in the future.
Maybe it could be a political tools that's corruption always present everywhere in different sectors of government. But I think the Central banks has a limited number of money to be imprinted in every time that there is a change of leadership. Because if they imprinted more bills ,it's value will decrease. There is a limit and also imprinting of bills are expensive.