Ok, I'll make the point less "salady" so it's clear.

The proposed "theory" is that by reducing the mining reward, less Dash goes to market and therefore price will not be so suppressed. The reason I say this theory is flawed is twofold:

1. the problem is wrongly framed. It should be framed as "how much $USD value does Dash mining have to draw from markets to support mining"
2. we've already tested this theory and found it to fail. We've lost dropped out of sight while our 5-year BTC clone competitors have not

To see the reason for point 2 you only need to look at point 1. Framing the problem in this way leads to a very different conclusion than further reducing the mining reward because it becomes clear that reducing the reward further has no effect other than to deliver is (surprised ?)...more of the same. Further loss of marketcap share.

If you want the detailed reasoning I'm afraid you'll have to go back to previous posts and consume some "salad"