Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: 🔥🔥🔥 How Nepotist Corruption Ruined Bitcointalk 🔥🔥🔥
by
dragonvslinux
on 08/07/2020, 15:00:03 UTC
For the sake clarity, I modified the negative trust to make it more relevant and decided to keep it red until or unless I see behaviour from the OP that makes me revise it to neutral.

I'm glad you've corrected the accuracy of your feedback. What about the others though that I  referenced above as well as PM'd you about?



Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855

References:
1. https://web.archive.org/web/20200529232531/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225711.msg53851746#msg53851746
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5252627.0
3. https://web.archive.org/save/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225711.msg53865312#msg53865312
4. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5252627.0

In references 1&3, there are no references to "merit abuse and fake trust circle" in the referenced posts that endorses Vispilio's campaign services.
In references 2&4, there are no mention of promoting Vispilio in the referenced post. What does Vispilio have to do with these users?

Ultimately it's up to you how you leave your feedback, but referencing your allegations is always a good start, as it's strengthens your feedback.
Surely there isn't the need for another 4 topics to clear this up. You're 33% there now, you're doing great.