This imbalanced person, he shouldn't judge me for nonsense reasons.
You judge him, he judges you - it's normal to compare other people's beliefs to your own.
The main difference is trendcoin left
neutral trust (not malicious), JollyGood appears to have retaliated with
negative trust (utilizing that deep-found DT power of his).
Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility (
source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.
If someone on the internet is mean to you:
boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them.
Sounds like a case of "boo fucking hoo", trendcoin clearly left some feedback to JollyGood that he didn't like and got tagged for it, again.
I guess the only honesty here is that JollyGood had already threatened to return the amended neutral feedback, and has now followed through with this threat:
The original feedback has been revised to neutral though it can be revised back to red if any circumstances arise.
Sounds like: If you don't drop this discussion criticizing my actions, I'll neg you. Then he negged him. The only circumstances that changes was trendcoin leaving neutral trust, and continuing to argue his point. The references provided for the neg are the
the same as before. There is no new information that has come to light regarding trendcoin and his trust-based actions, only his opinions.
This type of behavior reminds me of mosprognoz: great scam buster, but incapable of not abusing DT power.