Appealing to a centralized power is accepting defeat. Not to mention utterly pointless.
Although all dt1 members said there was an invalid feedback, they insisted on a negative notification.
All 100 of them? I have some doubts about that statement - can you point me to where that occurred?
I'd assume he meant all DT1 members (that voiced their opinion), excusing the
bad vague English that is. Sounds about right:
I see this bad practice from users tagging or leaving feedback just because they told something good about user x who they do not like or do not trust somehow.
The OP doesn't deserve red trust. Ignore - fine. Excluding from trust lists - probably advisable. Red trust due to posting in Vispilio's thread? No. That looks like red trust for an opinion.
Red trust is not deserved in my opinion, I don't see a reason why I shouldn't trust OP based on this feedback.
I am not agree with this feedback, reference is too weak comparing what wrote on the comment.
I do not think this is a good use of the feedback system.
@Trendcoin certainly does not deserve such a negative feedback.
Not sure if all of these opinions are DT1, but you get the idea. Apart from Vod's opinion I think, after he was talking about
"liberating" thousands of Bitcoins that is, not convinced you can take that off-topic shit seriously though. Sounds like a Bitcoin bank robbery. examplens otherwise thought it was a witch-hunt, but didn't express disapproval.
I'm really hoping we don't need 6 topics for this

This is now the fourth I see
