Re: Am I a shitposter? - asking for an honest opinion
Don't get on my nerves, if I decide not to count your one line comments, I can be justified. Over your time in the campaign I have pin pointed you as one of the users that merely make the minimum number of required post just to stay in the campaign. I do read your post which obviously had some quality in them which is why you're still a member of this campaign.
The spreedsheet is visible for everyone to review but here's a break down,
Like I said, you're not the first to get demoted neither would you be the last, in fact most users marked inactive since my announcement had been users trying to outsmart the inactivity rules to stay in the campaign like this user (semobo) who was demoted few weeks back to give room to the current their A members
Stop pointing fingers and work on yourself buddy;
Update: since it became clear this is about being accepted in a signature campaign: my statement above doesn't mean I would accept you in a campaign. There's a long way to go from "not a spammer so I can Merit you" to "wanting to encourage you financially to continue what you're doing".
The spreedsheet is visible for everyone to review but here's a break down,
- those which are mentioned here had the following number of posts (in order from round 68 to 78; those marked with "-" are out of the campaign):
- FatFork: 16, 15, 0, 18, 17, 25, 18, 23, 17, 16, 15
- FatFork: 16, 15, 0, 18, 17, 25, 18, 23, 17, 16, 15
Like I said, you're not the first to get demoted neither would you be the last, in fact most users marked inactive since my announcement had been users trying to outsmart the inactivity rules to stay in the campaign like this user (semobo) who was demoted few weeks back to give room to the current their A members
Maybe this might sound selfish, but I like new rules. Not because it allowed me to rank un on spreadsheet (yeah-yeah, I'm lying 
), but because they cleaned campaign from less effective members, and open doors to new ones. If just the campaign could return to "weekly payments", it would be perfect.
), but because they cleaned campaign from less effective members, and open doors to new ones. If just the campaign could return to "weekly payments", it would be perfect.Stop pointing fingers and work on yourself buddy;
Update: since it became clear this is about being accepted in a signature campaign: my statement above doesn't mean I would accept you in a campaign. There's a long way to go from "not a spammer so I can Merit you" to "wanting to encourage you financially to continue what you're doing".