Yes, here's a perfect example of him using big words and walls of text to feign a highly developed and impressive intellect.  While the premise of his argument starts out about anarchy, what he actually describes is far from it.  I'ts almost like he doesn't know the meaning of the word, but he must, mustn't he?  His waffling about the word, and vacillations in logic are actually kind of pedestrian, and mostly just drivel to fill out what initially looks like a well thought-out and contributory post, but is actually nothing but a shit post (in my opinion.)

You're welcome to think of me as envious of his ability to earn merit, as I'm welcome to consider you wrong in that assessment.  I would expect some members to come to his defense, especially the ones who showered him with merit.