With the development of stain analysis technology, one day chipmixer.com Anonymity may be broken!
Let's count (potential) chips, which is all addresses funded with a specific amount. From
List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance:
1 m
BTC: 265288 addresses
2 m
BTC: 67005 addresses
4 m
BTC: 30375 addresses
8 m
BTC: 15431 addresses
16 m
BTC: 7897 addresses
32 m
BTC: 3878 addresses
64 m
BTC: 1678 addresses
128 m
BTC: 1155 addresses
256 m
BTC: 597 addresses
500 m
BTC: 37896 addresses
512 m
BTC: 347 addresses
1000 m
BTC: 88063 addresses
1024 m
BTC: 338 addresses
2048 m
BTC: 114 addresses
4096 m
BTC: 145 addresses
8192 m
BTC: 57 addresses
I made a similar list
12 days ago.
Disclaimer: this counts the total remaining balance, so addresses with more than 1 input or even outputs are also included.I found that there are many bitcoin addresses for integers, such as 1btc, 0.5btc, 1M, 2m, 4m, 8m. Each integer bitcoin address has tens of thousands of addresses. If you hide yourself in tens of thousands of addresses. It is really impossible to trace the major breakthrough factors in the analysis of the combined confrontation chain,,,
I'm a novice. Do you mean the more addresses the chips are, the more anonymous they are？