When the idea was 1 CPU 1 vote this meant both hasrate and consensus validation was distributed. Upon the advent of ASICS harshpower began to centralize among the producers of the hardware as well as the large ASIC farms that became the current day miners.
Are you about to tell me that Satoshi never foresaw a day where 'maintaing the chain was the job of specialized servers, allowing users to just be users'?
First of all, Satoshi did make an evolving snapshot prediction based on what bitcoin was as of mid 2010 and how he considered bitcoin to potentially evolve, but NOT even Satoshi could predict every single factor or how events might play out, including how much intervention might be possible in terms of possible software changes (including segregated witness), or how back and forth competition whether we are talking about ASICs or just larger and larger computers or even government or financial institutions getting involved in mining or running nodes, even if a variety of matters, including a combination of running nodes and mining would help to determine bitcoin's direction or consensus that arises out of figuring out which users decide the direction of the chain or which chain is actually bitcoin, versus some snake oil baloney that spouts out talking points to try to propagandize people into believing that it might be the real bitcoin.
Currently, bitcoin does not have any meaningful competition from any of the cryptos or the sham bcash forks, so seems a bit ludicrous to continue to suggest any of the bcashes as if they were somehow sufficiently similar to bitcoin in terms of gaining much if any network effects, especially relative to bitcoin.