Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
jbreher
on 23/07/2020, 18:30:56 UTC
Your turn. What is the definition of decentralization to which you adhere, DaRude? Hmmm?

Riiiight, that's just you bitching about nodes, still not seeing you defining decentralization, and criteria that you used to come to conclusion that BTC and BSv are as decentralized? Surely you're not just putting out claims without backing them up  Roll Eyes

Still dodging, eh? Nothing to offer?

Huh, YOU claimed that both coins are equally decentralized, i asked for you to back it up, and you're asking me to define decentralization?

Yes. I quite clearly specified in what way I see it as such. You, OTOH, keep clinging to nothing other than 'but muh decentralization', with no explanation as to what you mean by such. Ball's in your court Bucky. Can you volley?

Quote
Ahh and there we have it. So following your logic and your definition of decentralization, BTC is as decentralized as BCD (Bitcoin Diamond)?

Well, no. As you would know, if you had more than two brain cells to scrape together, BCD is not a SHA256 coin. As such, it has no meaningful ties to the satoshi legacy.

Keep trying, tho. Maybe some day you'll arrive at an incisive observation.


Maybe.

Ahh right i see, so then by your definition of "decentralization" BCD is even more decentralized than BSv because it's NOT using SHA256?

Well, no.

By not having a tie to the satoshi protocol, BCD is irrelevant, no matter its level of decentralization.

Though your insistence on using it as an example does say a lot about you. After all, on the axis of mining distribution, if the criteria is 'who has enough resources to be able to economically mine it', then BCD is quite a bit more decentralized than is BTC. So as you are the one worshipping the false god of 'but muh decentralization', do you prefer BCD to BTC?

Incidentally, still waiting for that definition of 'decentralization' that you've been dodging for over a week now.