I'm not very free right now to write this properly but @neymarjr12 I find it quite strange also that AskGamblers rejected your complaint. I'd like to know how your complaint with SBR goes as well, like SyGambler says and I support the view: SBR is also respected in terms of mediating with bookies (although I personally have not actually met anyone who used them). I think in this case, we should accept (if the complaint is registered successfully) any decision that comes from them.

> > > But before you attempt to reopen complaints with AG or SBR, we could perhaps try and help you with wording your complaint (perhaps the wording of the request got you rejected, because from the response, it could be that they don't understand it?) so that it has a higher chance of success on your 2nd attempt? Could you hold off on doing that for now until we get SBR's decision?

@Royse777 thank you for your words and I think many appreciate what you and others are trying to do here. I know you from the Covid campaign (it is still fresh in my memory=) ) so I trust the intentions are similar. I know you named me and others as possible forum users to look into this case but I hope you agree with me as well that we cannot and should not look into this issue. This now deals with someone's (neymar's) identity and we must do all we can not to jeopardise his privacy.

@efialtis I actually agree with you here on some level. We have got to try to be as objective as possible when dealing with all these different cases. I, for one, have always tried to refrain from getting involved (I mean, we all got so much real life crap don't we!), but here I am somehow! Like you, and like others, I guess we are all so busy with real life! In the case for the flag, however, I have decided to oppose it, but not because I oppose your view, but on the very simple grounds that I believe there is at least some doubt on their guilt and there is no concret proof as I can tell on either party's guilt (In the same way I would not support a flag on neymar right now). I also agree on your point, that we, as a forum, do have a [non-obligatory] duty towards our fellow users, and this forum has, on its own, settled many a dispute. However, now we deal with someone's identity and that is something I feel is a line we are not allowed to cross -- not merely on principle but on legal grounds. Which is why I can only say that AG or SBR or some similar recognised industry mediator can settle this. If we, as a forum, have contributed towards both parties reaching a settlement on that recognised platform, then I feel we'd have done our "jobs".

Let's all keep this thread tidy and on topic so we don't derail the effort. I'm keen to see this resolved as I'm gambling there too!