My problem is the constant "x casino is reputable" rhetoric that I see not only here but on other, similar threads. The problem with this idea is that it is a form of denying the antecedent: you are changing the principle, "if they have scammed someone, then they will be marked as scammers," to "if they are not marked as scammers, then they have not scammed someone."
It is called "selective scamming". Your playerbase becomes so big, every once in a while you get to scam 1 person and nobody will notice or give a damn about it.
I don't know if sportsbet.io are scammers, yet but If the player didn't pass the KYC test, how can sportsbet.io prove it?
By sharing his KYC documents with us? That doesn't make sense to me.
There is only two things OP can do.
1- Take his initial deposit and move on.
2- Post his KYC documents here so we can check if they are real or not.
If he goes with the option 2, and we figure out that he is the real deal, sportsbet.io would deserve a flag then.
Note to self: Never ever play on a KYC infested casino.
2.
.
I can forward my e-mails with KYC documents that I sent to Sportsbet to your e-mails, write them down here or PM me.