It is settled then. Pick your guys.
Whoever he picks is going to have to liaise with Steve who runs the sportsbet.io account via PM or something to figure out why that KYC was rejected & how alt accounts may have been connected. Two sides to every story & all that otherwise it’s just a couple of rent-a-cops taking one side of the investigation. If it’s going to be a fair investigation you’ve got to do it properly.
Also threats of negative trust are not cool. If & a big IF sportsbet have done wrong I’d appreciate some advance warning & proofs before being painted red for doing nothing wrong.
I’ve been on this forum for nearly 6 years, never done anything wrong. I will remove my sig & avatar if there is a wrong doing by sportsbet but until then let this investigation continue.
Good luck to all involved.
Yeah - painting red - as nutildah stated before - would be wrong, agreed. Detrusting people would not and it's common sense when people who never engage (not even in this case) oppose a flag while they (what a coincidence) wear their sigs & avatars.
As already stated multiple times before with Royse777 making it clear as well - there is a BIG WRONG in supporting anyone just because they state they have their valid reason when the other party is totally transparent and ready for anything.
Peanuts for Sportsbet aren't peanuts for everyone - what we have here is a company that is withholding someone's money stating he broke tos (multi-accounting). They ask him to do KYC, he does and that's still not good enough. You can not just take someone's money WITHOUT giving explanation / providing proof - this is no rocket science?!?!?!