Lets please put things into perspective and try to remain cool headed.  This is a disagreement about how a business chose to handle a suspected cheater.  Whether they've provided the proper evidence in public, or not is immaterial.  Whether their suspicions are valid or not is immaterial.  Sportsbet has offered to return the accuser's money, and decided to refuse his business.  That's all, nothing more.  You may disagree with their decision, you may find it distasteful, or apply any other adjectives to the subject you choose.  But, in the end the decision is there's to make.

Let's not get to the point where established members are pissing each other off over a disagreement on how a business chose to handle a suspected cheater.