It's not similar at all. Livecoin confiscated user's full balance, not just winnings. Their TOS had a predatory clause about complaints (although this could be considered a matter of opinion). They failed to maintain and update their wallets, suffered losses (XMR and
What difference does it make if neymarjr here won his money fair and square? After he won his bets, that's his money. Not casino's.
If I were in his shoes, I wouldn't make the issue this big, I would take my initial deposit and move on but I perfectly understand why he decided to push it further.
Had Sportsbet done something like this I'd have no problem supporting the flag.
Again possibly a matter of opinion, but it wasn't a fine exchange. They had wallets disabled with no plan to ever re-enable them but allowed trading.
I didn't see massive or any serious scam accusations for that exchange. They were fine because they didn't have any negative trust ratings or flags before. I didn't mean it like their customer support or their UI was shit.
This would be similar if Sportsbet could be proven to deliberately allow bets they don't intend to pay out but I don't see that here.
Let's see what do we have here:
1- Sportsbet.io, accuses NeymarJr of multiaccounting without providing any proof, then asked for his KYC documents.
2- Sportsbet.io, denies his KYC documents because we don't know why. Again, no valid reason.
3- NeymarJr here is ready to share any kind of information including his private data with the beautiful trusted users of this forum and even ready to make a video conference.
I think OP's claim looks valid.
I'd say, with the information we got in our hands, Sportsbet.io should make him whole.