Honestly LFC,

I dislike, on principle, the fact that

- all DT opposition is receiving payment from SB. I'm not saying, receiving SP doesn't allow you to have an opinion, but 100% is alarming.
- That you included several members in your trust list just after they opposed the flag. Maybe you took the time to review all of them and thought to yourself you like their judgment, but once again, that's not how it looks.


All your argument is based on the fact that SP says the user failed KYC. But once again, it's just their voice against the users. Bitcoin stands for transparency, this feels a lot like obscurancy/despotism.

I'm quite surprised that SP refuses to share why he failed KYC. It would cost them 0, and make all this noise and potential reputation harming story go away. This is the only reason I believe there is more to it, but again I can be wrong.

We need transparence, specially in crypto, and on this matter we have 0. And I find this sad, even more when you want to be N°1 like Sportsbet.

Once again, I'd love SP to show us that they are right to deny the full refund, but they aren't for some reason.

---

OP are you also a paid sportsbet campaign member? Because in any other case I don't see how using your main account would do you any harm. The only possibility is that your main account has big trust issues.

I'm not supporting the flag, but I'm also not comfortable with how the flag got supported by LFC and the brand new DT2 resulting of his trust list changes. I will change my trust list accordingly.