I know your heart is in the right place but... you supported a "written contract" flag without there being a violation of a written contract. That alone should be a sufficient reason why there is not enough support for it.
I was the one who suggested neymarjr12 to create a flag type 3. Now it seems I misguided him, if it really matters the flag type 2 is valid over flag type 3. I will keep my support on the flag type 3 until there is a flag type 2.
Trying to go after LFC_Bitcoin for his PMs just highlights the fact that the you have no solid case.
This is not my case nor LFC_Bitcoin's. This is a case between neymarjr12 and sportsbet.io but some reasoning I see here which are convincing for me to ask for more details that was done in PM because it is relevant in this case.
If any recipients feel those PMs were inappropriate they should report them to admin. But there are hundreds of DT members whom LFC_Bitcoin didn't PM and they can still support or oppose the flag unencumbered by whatever bias you suspect here.
I am sure they would or will but looking at the easy opposing from the members who opposed the flag so far, and seeing LFC_Bitcoin to add a newbie member account in his trust list which pointed by
marlboroza makes this case very uncomfortable for LFC_Bitcoin.
I hope now you will not come up with this that everyone is free to add/remove anyone in their trust list. I already know this.