I can't believe this thread has gotten so much attention.  It's nothing but an obvious attempt at trolling DT members who disagree with you.  If you were at all confident in your position then you would have posted all this drudge from your main account.  Which brings up the question; who's the real "sell-out?"  The member who calls balls and strikes like he sees them, from his main account, or the cowardly member who refuses to address controversial issues with his main account to prevent being "black-listed" by other campaign managers?

In all honesty, until you called me out and I went to check the spreadsheet, I wasn't even sure that I was still on Sportsbet.io's payroll.  I sent a PM to the campaign manager on May 9th informing him that I would likely be too busy to comply with the minimum post requirement for that week, and possibly subsequent weeks.  I also told him that if he felt I was no longer supporting the campaign as needed, to feel free removing me.

Now back to the subject at hand; how many shit-stirring newbies do get on this forum compared to honest, long-standing, legitimate businesses?  How much support has the forum and the bitcoin community received from these newbies compared to this specific legitimate business?  Sportsbet.io has exposed the bitcoin logo to millions of Soccer fans, they didn't have to do that, they could just as easily had their own logo on Watford's sleeves.  All anyone has to do is spend just a few days following their official thread to know what kind of people they are.  They care about this community, they care about bitcoin, and they obviously care about their customers.  I say this as someone who doesn't gamble, and generally speaking I have no love casinos as a whole.  

As for the accuser, I'm convinced he's a liar.  The way he constructs his sentences and the use of certain phrases that are only common to native English speakers make it very hard for me to believe he's using a translator (like he claims.)  So yeah, I think he's full of shit.

I'm astonished at the reasoning of a few members in this particular case.  On one hand we have the word of a well established business with a long history and reputation of supporting our community, while on the other hand we have the word of a shady newbie, insisting he be compensated more than he deposited.  Is it really that hard to understand why I would choose to side with sportsbet.io in this situation?

I do acknowledge that the question remains; why isn't sportsbet.io divulging more information about the detection and suspicion of the accuser's cheating?  I don't know, but I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt and surmise they have a good reason.  Not because I'm wearing their signature, because they've earned it.  As others have noted Bitcasino.io recently had a similar accusation and provided information to the community, so it only stands to reason that their sister company has similar methods of detecting cheaters.  But that's not to say it's the only method of detection, or that the cheaters were using the same methods to defraud the system.  Maybe there is more to the story, maybe one of their methods is insufficient and only partially effective, and this user found a way to navigate around it.  Divulging their detection method for this situation may inadvertently expose a vulnerability that they want to fix before they provide more information.  That seems like enough speculation, I'm sure you get the point.