Being a "high risk shithead" is not the same as being "high-risk in trading".
No, I meant exactly a shithead who is high-risk in trading as evidenced by escalating a dispute after binding mediation. Thanks for trying to explain my words but you're shit at that job so you're fired.
If someone offers to mediate a dispute, and the mediation is unable to offer an explanation that is satisfactory to observers, there is no reason why an observer should be obligated to accept the outcome of said mediation. This is even true for the OP, unless he has explicitly agreed the outcome of the mediation is binding, which I have not seen evidence of. It is not uncommon for parties involved in a dispute to engage in non-binding mediation to try to resolve disputes; sometimes it is successful, but oftentimes it is not.
Some more gobbledygook. Mediation is not for "observers".