Come on. You know that's a neutral at best. It's a comment on them as an individual and their posting/trolling. Unless it is Neymarjr. or sportsbet.io you plan to tag for carrying on afterwards. Then it could be seen as a trade dispute and relevant to a warning about transacting with them.
Not going to lie I was pretty opposed to this idea of a "Jury of mediators". Not that I don't trust/respect most of your judgement most of the time, it just seemed like a forced scenario. I had a minor exchange with sportsbet after the decision had already been made to go ahead with this - I was unaware of that and we started talking about something different - My suggestion was for them to seek out that Askgamblers.com themselves and see if they would hear the case from that point.
I cannot advocate for a process such as this where forum members are asked to arbitrate or give a judgement on matters such as these. As the Askgamblers.com website is there to rule on things such as this, why was that route not taken instead?
I see this as precedent setting where individuals might see this as the new accepted method to demand answers from the backend of a company. Just my opinion. H
My sentiments exactly, I already stated that this could be start of a very dangerous precedent where it is the new norm of a route that anybody making an allegation can go down.