I did not consider what I said to have been dumb when I said it.
I thought that I was largely attempting to address the concept of the dead zone, and you had come up with a theory that speculated that the deadzone was NOT a deadzone.
With your more than 9 years in bitcoinlandia, you should already know that those theories of supposed everyone wanting to sell their BTC at the previous ATH had been presented numerous times before, and there tends to be little to no actual evidence to support those kind of selling at previous ATH theories beyond the fact that a lot of people spout them out as if there were facts to actually back them up. Am I missing something?
I actually think you are attributing something to my words that I did not mean. I am not predicting some doom and gloom scenario where it is incredibly hard to get past the ATH, or that a pullback after breaching it a little bit is going to be earth shattering.
Again I think back to the last even where bitcoin first re-crossed it's (what was in NOV14?) previous ATH ~1100 or whatever it was. There was a good pull back after that, and the general air was kinda mixed. There was a LOT of fear at that time. In retrospect the entire thing was very quick. But the road was a little bumpy around that price at the time.
I think there is a good chance we see something like that again. I dunno HOW good? 50/50? It doesn't really matter. But a LOT of people got into bitcoin in late 2017, and some of those have soured on it. We *will* have to chew through that resistance. And like I also said it might just get blown by as well.
But what i am doing is practicing putting on my fog lights now so that when it gets foggy I have the best chance at good outcomes.