Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
by
TECSHARE
on 02/08/2020, 05:30:23 UTC
My goal was not to have you removed from the default trust list until now.

That was 5 years ago^^^

You just do the same thing over and over again each time hoping it will end with vod destroyed and you the hero, and then you act all shocked and appalled when nobody really cares because you've been doing this constantly for how many years now?  

Think about how much time and effort you've put into this beef with vod over the years.  You're clearly very unhappy that vod isn't getting what you think he deserves but maybe try focusing on something else when you feel that rage bubbling up.  Then go find some old rants and read them out loud to yourself.  You might be surprised at the rabid-yet-insecure pig vibes you give off when you get really emotional.


And this is now. So now you not only speak for Vod, you speak for me now too do you? I am not doing anything but raising grievance with Vods systemic abuse of the trust system each time he abuses it. I don't know under what kind of batshit distraction narrative you think that turns out where I am a hero, but I am being perpetrated against, not perpetrating. As a result the responsibility for the repetitive nature of this retardation falls upon one resident Canukistani lunatic named Vod.

He never justifies himself. He never substantiates his claims. He is a stalker and a lunatic, and people like you desperately distract from his indisputably abhorrent behavior because it serves you to attack me instead. According to you, me complaining about his behavior is more of an issue than his behavior, and thus this is my responsibility and not his. Anyways now that you have done your Twatty Squeal Desperate Distraction Topic Sliding Dance ™, lets get back to the actual topic of discussion:


Vod   2020-07-27   Reference   "Trading trust with a known scammer. You do not need to trust someone when they send first. "

So Vod just gets to make his own rules eh? Now I can't engage in an exchange with a 3rd party he doesn't like without receiving a negative rating?

What is the purpose and substantiation behind this claim Vod? There is no reference and so far your response has been non-response. As usual you will desperately avoid making any attempt at explaining your behavior because you know you have zero justification, just like all the other times you have done this.