Do you agree with this type of government regulation? Do you believe that it's perfectly fine for regulation to progress to that level, if enough people believe there is a need for it? Why do you believe this regulation is justice, just because it was passed by the government with the people's consent?
I'd also like to ask some additional questions. If there is a line drawn where there is "too strict regulation", by what guiding principle is that line drawn? Also, where does that principle come from?
I'll even make it simplier. What principles are your politcal ideologies based upon, if any? Among that set of principles, which are in conflict with libertarian principles and how?
Off the top of my head, I'd have to say that one of the primary conflicts (especially in this thread) is that we (REDACTED INDIRECT INSULT) value the right to life over trivial, admittedly pull-from-ass rights like the right to own a nuke, the right to juggle small pox vials, the right to manufacture biological weapons in your basement, the right to store an armed bomb in your shed that's ten feet from my house, etc.
I think that's one of the main disagreements.