Odds of <2.00x could lead to way more reds than 7 in a row. The odds are similar in all casino games like Dice, Crash, Roulette etc, but differ in terms of house edge basically.
I heard about 36 reds in a row in a popular casino sometime back which was said to be a record. It can go even higher if your luck is insanely bad. Personally, I have seen 20+ reds in a row while playing games like Crash and Dice.
You are experiencing gambler's fallacy op because every roll is independent of the next one which is why 40 reds in a row are possible too.
I'm not experiencing any sort of gambler's fallacy because I wasn't speculating. I was simply asking a question of people's experiences. If you haven't played the game, then frankly your input isn't necessary.
Roobet crash is a computerized game meaning that, unlike a live roulette game or something similar, it has an algorithm feeding it's numbers. The reason I posed the question is to survey people's experiences with the game to understand if that algorithm truly is entirely random. I'm not convinced that is it yet because I haven't heard the first-hand experiences from different people of these freak "20 reds in a row" streaks.
It's entirely possible that, unlike live odds games where the martingale system is systematically imperfect, one response could have an effect on the next. This is the reason for my inquiry.
I would still love to hear other responses and experiences from people in the community.
Cheers!