The player apparently made at least 50 bets, some of which were wins and some of which were losses. So the net amount won is what he is claiming to be the "amount scammed." Of course I disagree with the word "scam" here because that implies a net monetary loss, which didn't happen no matter how you frame it. Its arguable that he was scammed out of his time or the money he could have been up by placing the same bets elsewhere (if that was an option).
If I had lost my deposits, they would have allowed me to keep on playing more and more. Few seconds to register, deposit and play, but then more than a week to just recover my deposit. How does this even make any logical sense to you?
They always have the upperhand here. What would have happened if I had lost all my deposits? Surely they would have never frozen the account, I wouldnt have ever been accused of breaking the rules, and Sportsbet.io would have allowed me to keep on playing more.
It is not like the player can freeze from the casino what he has already lost when he suspects the casino is cheating/abusing him in some way, and then walk away.
Even if I lose it all, I accept it and move on. Why cant they accept that after winning a few bets legitimally, the profits from those belong to me? Where is the fairness?
And if they suspect I violated their ToS, where is the evidence? Not even a simple clarification has ever been given!