In your scenario, you're describing a sportsbook that I simply wouldn't play at, but I don't think Sportsbet sees their decisions as "arbitrary." You see them as arbitrary.
I'm describing Sportsbet.io.Check the Terms and Conditions.
I don't see the word "arbitrary" there.
They doesn't have to include it as there ToS is already very self defensive and trappy to anyone with geniune winnings on the site. It is selective scamming in a way and does not secure users interest if clear reasons are not shown to the customer or player after accusing them of something as empty as multiple accounting.
And, if seen overall even if any casino or sportsbook manages to accuse 5 out of 100 customer's for voliting multi accounting rule they are in all increasing there house edge.
"Perfect" sportsbook would be non custodial. Where the book never has possession of your funds.
Check Degens.com as it uses smart contracts that are audited. It's 100% KYC free. So there is no 'multi account' issues. And nobody at Degens can touch your money.
Centralized sportsbooks won't exist for long IMO. Non custodial, decentralized books fixes all the dozens of problems cited about sportbet etc.
Check Degens.com as it uses smart contracts that are audited. It's 100% KYC free. So there is no 'multi account' issues. And nobody at Degens can touch your money.
Centralized sportsbooks won't exist for long IMO. Non custodial, decentralized books fixes all the dozens of problems cited about sportbet etc.
Solid promotion !
