I seek clarity on why asking for explanation or discussion of confirmed facts that impact on the safety members  is shit stirring?
I want to know why you feel the need to punish members for discussing very important and pertinent facts which could lead to honest members being scammed.
You I note have stated lfcbitcoin deliberately attempted to misrepresent your discussion to a point you even have stated you felt the need to exclude him. Are you a shit starter or were you lying? Why object to my thread asking for deep investigation by admins and meta members and their opinions ?
This type of member is not suitable for DT1. After looking there due to a relationship from the betting site I use I will expect they must now remove this shill lcfbitcoin due to being a confirmed liar and also giving trust inclusion for favorable flagging support.
This is not an honest member.  Asking for action from cobra and theymos to investigate is not shit stirring.
Is scammer hunting shit stirring?  Who cares if I'm a noob or elder member if we discuss what any person can see themselves.
Your choice of words is clearly meant as a punishment for highlighting the truth and ask for some action here. This should be looked at. I will hear what cobra and theymos say after deeper investigation.
100btc is laughable most elder members who are only suitable for DT1 would have many more. That 100 batch can be kept as reserve  to ensure they are always without pressure to give in to temptation or pressure to be dishonest. Why do you need over 100 Dt1 this is madness removes sensible accountability and now any noob with no btc and only been here a few months with no trading history or any value to the account can be DT1. Crazy.

Why marlboroza saying i will be the pharmacist? I am not the pharmacist or if you mean taking drugs then nope.