I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot.
I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge)
I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning.
How come it become profitable? you can lose on both games also in my experience in slots you needed a lot of money to hit a jackpot unlike the dice game you don't need to wait for a jackpot you can gain some small amount from winning and you can use strategy like martingale unlike slots there are different winnings depends on the patterns. Not really fan of slots.
Andycarrol you are right, we lose on both games. What's interesting is that we really need more money for playing slots than
dices. With my deposits I have for a few spins, while I can play dices for a lot longer. It's true that slots can be more profitable, but
if slots can be more profitable it means that on slots there can be more loses! I am not fan of slots either, becasue they are really
expensive to play.
When it comes to capital or the starting fund, playing dice is more good because like you said it only requires small amount of bet unlike in dice where the minimum bet can be expensive for other gamblers just like when I play in roobet where I can bet $0.1 in dice while their minimum bet in slots is $0.3 and for me the difference is huge and it is the reason why I play more dice than in slots. Both of them are profitable, it is really depends on certain gambler on what is their preferences.