Re: Should confirmed liars with close links to other liars and scammers be on DT1?

I note so many liars, decievers and scammers infesting DT1 and DT2?

I don't know, did you? What's with all these questions?

Look, if there are such users it should be resolved within system, you just have to point such accounts and tell everyone your concerns, don't go all the way around.

Quote from: Laudanum on Today at 12:45:03 AM

On topic please.

Report off topic posts to moderator if that bothers you, but as you can see, probably no one from users above really knows what the fuck you are talking about.

The op has been here since 2012 (apparently) but can't find the edit button anywhere: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5268455.msg54984425#msg54984425

@op could you just stick to one active thread, it'd help everyone understand what's going on much better. You can lock this one in the bottom left if you like.

Also the edit button should be visible in the top right of your posts if you want to transfer stuff across.

Completely separate discussions. One is discussing the suitability of a proven liar and scammer on DT1.
The other is discussing whether presenting indisputable truths that have serious implications for honest members and inviting investigation means you warrant being punished.

If you have read both threads and reviewed the links and still are unable to make a distinction then I feel you have done your best. I appreciate your help good member.